- gamertag: duard0
- user homepage:
Me by mehve | "oderint dum metuant" | d[(oo)]T
"It's not who I am underneath, but what I do that defines me."-Batman
77135
Posted by: sesquipadelian
i, like just about everyone else in the forums, am entirely ignorant of the trust system's formulation process, and i am curious about how bans and warnings are taken into account. specifically, i wonder if the bungie higher-ups have the ability to not only see the message that was sent announcing a warning or ban, but if they can also see the posts that lead to the warning or ban. seeing that a person was warned or banned is helpful, but being able to see the material that was viewed by one person as being a violation could also be of use.I wonder this myself. It would appear (to me) that this is the case with bans now. It seems that once someone reports something about an individual, and then other people do it, it starts to add up and is collected in a bin of sorts, where the mods/Web team can view the bins and see whether or not that individual should be banned or not. That's what I think after observing numerous posts from the mods.
Posted by: sesquipadelian
Posted by: atomic weggie
Posted by: Hunter501
Of who I've seen who has a Heroic or above, I don't really agree with all of them...
I would have got my Legendary rank, but I was modded in six of my last nine months on B.net. FIX YOUR FORUMS BUNGIE!
what do you mean when you say you were modded in the bnet forums? did someone hack into your account and make inappropriate posts from your bnet id?I think he was joking...
also, what do you suppose is the distinction between the various titles (heroic to legendary, and so on)?To me, it seems that Legendary members get ranked based on when they joined (i.e. before 06/01/2004). It also could be popularity also...we can't really be sure though.